Louis M. v O’Malley (S.D. Ga. Oct. 9, 2024) - AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, DOT/VE conflict 2) The ALJ’s mental RFC

2) The ALJ’s mental RFC finding is deficient as it failed to address any limitations in interacting with supervisors

the court found the ALJ failed to comply with SSR 12-2p which recognizes that “symptoms of [fibromyalgia] can wax and wane so that a person may have ‘bad days and good days’” and that the Ruling requires ALJs to “consider a longitudinal record whenever possible” when evaluating a disability claim based on fibromyalgia

ORDER: A baseball analogy appears particularly appropriate in response to the Commissioner’s request: three strikes and you are out

Yet even under this deferential standard

2020) (Decision by Rosemary S

Louis M. v O’Malley (S.D. Ga. Oct. 9, 2024) - AC evidence, medical opinions, RFC, DOT/VE conflict 2) The ALJ’s mental RFCLouis M. v OMalley, Case No 4: 24 cv 00044 JRH CLR (S. D. Ga. Oct. 9, 2024) (Order by U. S. District Judge J. Randal Hall) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief and remand order Topics addressed: New evidence submitted to the Appeals Council Definition of a medical source opinion Medical opinions required findings Medical opinions consistency Medical opinions supportability Medical opinions articulation requirements Improper substitution of medical