[Angelo R.] v. Saul, 796 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2020) - improper reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, composite job trying a variety of treatments

trying a variety of treatments

New evidence submitted to the Appeals Council

(citing Bauer v

2) The ALJ’s mental residual functional capacity assessment is not supported by substantial evidence

on reconsideration

[Angelo R.] v. Saul, 796 F. App’x 49 (2d Cir. 2020) - improper reliance on ALJ’s lay interpretation of the record, composite job trying a variety of treatmentsngelo R]. v. Saul, 796 F. Appx 49 (2d Cir. 2020) (Decision by Rosemary S. Pooler and Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judges, and District Judge Jesse M. Furman, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation) Briefs Included: Appellants Initial Brief and Appellants Reply Brief Topics addressed: RFC lack of support for findings RFC reliance on ALJs lay interpretation of the record Past relevant work required